4.5 Article

Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism

期刊

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 2023-2049

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x

关键词

Robots; Moral status; Moral standing; Ethical behaviourism; Procreative beneficence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Can robots have significant moral status? This is an emerging topic of debate among roboticists and ethicists. This paper makes three contributions to this debate. First, it presents a theory-'ethical behaviourism'-which holds that robots can have significant moral status if they areroughly performatively equivalentto other entities that have significant moral status. This theory is then defended from seven objections. Second, taking this theoretical position onboard, it is argued that the performative threshold that robots need to cross in order to be afforded significant moral status may not be that high and that they may soon cross it (if they haven't done so already). Finally, the implications of this for our procreative duties to robots are considered, and it is argued that we may need to take seriously a duty of 'procreative beneficence' towards robots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Editorial Material Ethics

Embracing Human Obsolescence: Implications for the Enhancement Project

John Danaher

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS (2019)

Article Ethics

In Defence of the Hivemind Society

John Danaher, Steve Petersen

Summary: The concept of humans forming hivemind societies is plausible and beneficial for sentient flourishing, contrary to common fears of it being a dystopian nightmare.

NEUROETHICS (2021)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

What Matters for Moral Status: Behavioral or Cognitive Equivalence?

John Danaher

CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS (2021)

Article Economics

Axiological futurism: The systematic study of the future of values

John Danaher

Summary: Human values vary across time and space, raising questions about the future of human values. Can we study the future of human values in an insightful and systematic way? This article makes three contributions to the debate about the future of human values.

FUTURES (2021)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Should We Use Technology to Merge Minds?

John Danaher, Sven Nyholm

CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS (2021)

Article Ethics

Robot Betrayal: a guide to the ethics of robotic deception

John Danaher

ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (2020)

Article Humanities, Multidisciplinary

THE PHILOSOPHICAL CASE FOR ROBOT FRIENDSHIP

John Danaher

JOURNAL OF POSTHUMAN STUDIES-PHILOSOPHY TECHNOLOGY MEDIA (2019)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

The rise of the robots and the crisis of moral patiency

John Danaher

AI & SOCIETY (2019)

Article Law

The foundations of conscientious objection: against freedom and autonomy

Yossi Nehushtan, John Danaher

JURISPRUDENCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL AND POLITICAL THOUGHT (2018)

Article Philosophy

The Case Against Work John Danaher argues that work is a bad thing

John Danaher

TPM-THE PHILOSOPHERS MAGAZINE (2018)

暂无数据