Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis

Distributions ofp-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?

(2016) Chris H.J. Hartgerink et al.   PeerJ

Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies

(2016) Dean Langan et al.   Research Synthesis Methods

The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses

(2015) Paul T von Hippel   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data

(2015) Kirsty M. Rhodes et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science

(2015) Megan L. Head et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis

(2015) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al.   Research Synthesis Methods

Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage

(2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer   Journal of Statistical Software

The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature

(2015) Michał Krawczyk   PLoS One

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases

(2014) F Song et al.   HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer

(2014) A. Franco et al.   SCIENCE

Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis

(2014) Rebecca M. Turner et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE

An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature

(2013) L. R. Jager et al.   BIOSTATISTICS

Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias

(2013) Gregory Francis   JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY

US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research

(2013) D. Fanelli et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis

(2013) C. W. Jones et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias

(2013) T. D. Stanley et al.   Research Synthesis Methods

Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses

(2012) Dan Jackson et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE

Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries

(2011) Daniele Fanelli   SCIENTOMETRICS

Could It Be Better to Discard 90% of the Data? A Statistical Paradox

(2010) T. D. Stanley et al.   AMERICAN STATISTICIAN

How to do a meta-analysis

(2010) Andy P. Field et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY

“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences

(2010) Daniele Fanelli   PLoS One

Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead

(2008) Gerta Rücker et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated

(2008) John P. A. Ioannidis   EPIDEMIOLOGY

Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified

(2008) J. P T Higgins   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

(2008) Kerry Dwan et al.   PLoS One