4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

GNE: a deep learning framework for gene network inference by aggregating biological information

期刊

BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-019-0694-y

关键词

Gene interaction networks; Gene expression; Network embedding; Heterogeneous data integration; Deep learning

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1062422]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R15GM116102]
  3. NSF [1062422]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1062422] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe topological landscape of gene interaction networks provides a rich source of information for inferring functional patterns of genes or proteins. However, it is still a challenging task to aggregate heterogeneous biological information such as gene expression and gene interactions to achieve more accurate inference for prediction and discovery of new gene interactions. In particular, how to generate a unified vector representation to integrate diverse input data is a key challenge addressed here.ResultsWe propose a scalable and robust deep learning framework to learn embedded representations to unify known gene interactions and gene expression for gene interaction predictions. These low- dimensional embeddings derive deeper insights into the structure of rapidly accumulating and diverse gene interaction networks and greatly simplify downstream modeling. We compare the predictive power of our deep embeddings to the strong baselines. The results suggest that our deep embeddings achieve significantly more accurate predictions. Moreover, a set of novel gene interaction predictions are validated by up-to-date literature-based database entries.ConclusionThe proposed model demonstrates the importance of integrating heterogeneous information about genes for gene network inference. GNE is freely available under the GNU General Public License and can be downloaded from GitHub (https://github.com/kckishan/GNE).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据