4.7 Review

A scientometric analysis and critical review of construction related ontology research

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 17-31

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.013

关键词

Ontology; Research trends; Scientometrics; CiteSpace; Construction industry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878311, 71732001]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017KFYXJJ134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a wide range of literature on adopting ontology to solve construction problems, but no review of existing studies has systematically analyzed and visualized the trends in ontology research. This study reviews ontology research mainly published in the Scopus database from 2007 to 2017 with the combination of scientometric analysis and critical review. Scientometric analysis (e.g. co-author, co-word, co-citation, and clusters) objectively visualized the research status quo while a critical review was used to identify the research themes and challenges of ontology research in the construction industry. The results identified a large network of co-authors in this field to understand collaboration relationships. Over half the papers (53%) were published by the following three countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The top co-occurring keywords were project management at which ontology facilitates knowledge management and information retrieval. When the time factor was taken into consideration, keywords naturally evolved from project management, and knowledge management to building information modeling, and compliance control with the successful adoption of information techniques in the construction industry. Four research themes were identified with the combination of cluster analysis and critical review: Domain ontology, Industry foundation classes, Automated compliance checking, and Building information modeling. This review provides an in-depth understanding of existing ontology research and indicates the emerging trends in this research domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据