4.5 Article

Optimal control of intelligent vehicle longitudinal dynamics via hybrid model predictive control

期刊

ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 190-200

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2018.11.020

关键词

Intelligent vehicle; Longitudinal dynamics; Hybrid system; Mixed logical dynamical model; Experimental tests

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51705207, U1564201]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M611728]
  3. Postdoctoral Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [1701112B]
  4. Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province, China [GDZB-163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an innovative application of the hybrid model predictive control (HMPC) scheme to optimally regulate the intelligent vehicle longitudinal velocity. For autonomous velocity regulation, the intelligent vehicle needs to be operated in two distinct modes (drive and brake) and because of the mode-dependent constraints on accelerations and decelerations by considering the comfort of passengers, the intelligent vehicle longitudinal dynamics control process can be regarded as a constrained hybrid dynamical system. Thus, in this study, the intelligent vehicle longitudinal dynamics is approximated as a two-mode discrete-time mixed logical dynamical (MLD) system. Using this approximation, a hybrid model predictive controller, which allows us to optimize the switching sequences of the operation modes (binary control inputs) and the torques acted on the wheels (continuous control inputs), is tuned based on online mixed-integer quadratic programming. Numerical simulation analysis is conducted for a sport utility vehicle to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control method. Finally, the explicit representation of the HMPC is computed to control the intelligent vehicle in real-time, and the experimental results are presented to show the applicability of the proposed controller. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据