4.6 Review

Systematic Review of the Mediterranean Diet for Long-Term Weight Loss

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 129, 期 4, 页码 407-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.11.028

关键词

Cardiovascular disease; Diet; Mediterranean; Systematic review; Weight loss

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Although the long-term health benefits of the Mediterranean diet are well established, its efficacy for weight loss at >= 12 months in overweight or obese individuals is unclear. We therefore conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effect of the Mediterranean diet on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor levels after >= 12 months. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials for RCTs published in English or French and with follow-up >= 12 months that examined the effect of the Mediterranean diet on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor levels in overweight or obese individuals trying to lose weight. RESULTS: Five RCTs (n = 998) met our inclusion criteria. Trials compared the Mediterranean diet to a lowfat diet (4 treatment arms), a low-carbohydrate diet (2 treatment arms), and the American Diabetes Association diet (1 treatment arm). The Mediterranean diet resulted in greater weight loss than the low-fat diet at >= 12 months (range of mean values: -4.1 to -10.1 kg vs 2.9 to -5.0 kg), but produced similar weight loss as other comparator diets (range of mean values: -4.1 to -10.1 kg vs -4.7 to -7.7 kg). Moreover, the Mediterranean diet was generally similar to comparator diets at improving other cardiovascular risk factor levels, including blood pressure and lipid levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the Mediterranean diet results in similar weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor level reduction as comparator diets in overweight or obese individuals trying to lose weight. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据