4.6 Article

Chronological age, biological age, and individual variation in the stress response in the European starling: a follow-up study

期刊

PEERJ
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5842

关键词

Biological age; Stress response; Corticosterone; Developmental programming; Starlings; Telomeres

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J016446/1, BB/J016292/1]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [AdG 666669]
  3. BBSRC [BB/J016446/1, BB/J016292/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The strength of the avian stress response declines with age. A recently published study of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) found that a marker of biological age predicted the strength of the stress response even in individuals of the same chronological age. Specifically, birds that had experienced greater developmental telomere attrition (DTA) showed a lower peak corticosterone (CORT) response to an acute stressor, and more rapid recovery of CORT levels towards baseline. Here, we performed a follow-up study using the same capture-handling-restraint stressor in a separate cohort of starlings that had been subjected to a developmental manipulation of food availability and begging effort. We measured the CORT response at two different age points (4 and 18 months). Our data suggest a decline in the strength of the CORT response with chronological age: peak CORT was lower at the second age point, and there was relatively more reduction in CORT between 15 and 30 min. Individual consistency between the two age points was low, but there were modest familial effects on baseline and peak CORT. The manipulation of begging effort affected the stress response (specifically, the reduction in CORT between 15 and 30 min) in an age-dependent manner. However, we did not replicate the associations with DTA observed in the earlier study. We meta-analysed the data from the present and the earlier study combined, and found some support for the conclusions of the earlier paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据