4.5 Review

Engineered In Vitro Models of Tumor Dormancy and Reactivation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13036-018-0120-9

关键词

Extracellular matrix; Single cell dormancy; Angiogenic dormancy; Quiescence; Metastasis; Relapse; Hypoxia; Drug Testing; Tissue Engineering; Microphysiological Systems

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute IMAT Program [R21CA214299]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Award [1751797]
  3. Delaware Bioscience Center for Advanced Technology [12A00448]
  4. W.M. Keck Foundation [15A00396]
  5. NSF IGERT Fellowship [1144726]
  6. University of Delaware
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1751797] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metastatic recurrence is a major hurdle to overcome for successful control of cancer-associated death. Residual tumor cells in the primary site, or disseminated tumor cells in secondary sites, can lie in a dormant state for long time periods, years to decades, before being reactivated into a proliferative growth state. The microenvironmental signals and biological mechanisms that mediate the fate of disseminated cancer cells with respect to cell death, single cell dormancy, tumor mass dormancy and metastatic growth, as well as the factors that induce reactivation, are discussed in this review. Emphasis is placed on engineered, in vitro, biomaterial-based approaches to model tumor dormancy and subsequent reactivation, with a focus on the roles of extracellular matrix, secondary cell types, biochemical signaling and drug treatment. A brief perspective of molecular targets and treatment approaches for dormant tumors is also presented. Advances in tissue-engineered platforms to induce, model, and monitor tumor dormancy and reactivation may provide much needed insight into the regulation of these processes and serve as drug discovery and testing platforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据