Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases
出版年份 2018 全文链接
标题
Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases
作者
关键词
Academic search engine, Academic bibliographic database, Query hit count, Size, Iterative analysis, Metrics, Google Scholar
出版物
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages 177-214
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2018-11-10
DOI
10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison
- (2018) Alberto Martín-Martín et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis
- (2018) Mike Thelwall Journal of Informetrics
- Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories
- (2018) Alberto Martín-Martín et al. Journal of Informetrics
- A survey on scholarly data: From big data perspective
- (2017) Samiya Khan et al. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT
- The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university
- (2017) Sven E. Hug et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Microsoft Academic is one year old: the Phoenix is ready to leave the nest
- (2017) Anne-Wil Harzing et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation
- (2017) John Mingers et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature
- (2017) Gali Halevi et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?
- (2017) Alberto Martin-Martin et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar
- (2015) Enrique Orduna-Malea et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
- (2015) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus
- (2015) Juan-Carlos Valderrama-Zurián et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network
- (2014) Richard Van Noorden NATURE
- The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search
- (2014) Enrique Orduña-Malea et al. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web
- (2014) Madian Khabsa et al. PLoS One
- Retrieving Clinical Evidence: A Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for Quick Clinical Searches
- (2013) Salimah Z Shariff et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages
- (2013) Enrique Orduña-Malea et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A longitudinal study of Google Scholar coverage between 2012 and 2013
- (2013) Anne-Wil Harzing SCIENTOMETRICS
- The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study
- (2013) Joost C. F. de Winter et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h‐index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia – siren songs and air‐raid sirens
- (2012) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis
- (2011) Isidro F. Aguillo SCIENTOMETRICS
- Google and the scholar: the role of Google in scientists' information‐seeking behaviour
- (2010) Hamid R. Jamali et al. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Bibliometrics to webometrics
- (2008) Mike Thelwall JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
- Google Scholar revisited
- (2008) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review
- (2008) Judit Bar-Ilan Journal of Informetrics
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started