4.7 Article

Diagnosis of apple replant disease (ARD): Microscopic evidence of early symptoms in fine roots of different apple rootstock genotypes

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 583-594

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.014

关键词

Bioassay; Blackening; Cell damage; Cell vitality; Malus domestica; Root hair status

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Research and Education [FKZ 031B0025A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apple replant disease (ARD) is a problem of high economic relevance in tree nurseries and apple orchards worldwide. After replanting, plants show growth reduction, reduced yield, and damaged root systems. The disease's decade-long persistence in soil exacerbates the situation where alternative cultivation areas and ecologically safe soil decontamination measures are lacking. The etiology is still unclear and there are neither clear causal factors nor reliable parameters (except growth data from plant bioassays) for the early detection of the disease in plants or from samples from potentially affected soils. We report on greenhouse pot trials with the susceptible rootstock Malus domestica 'M26' grown in soils of ARD-affected as well as grass plots from three different field sites. Both gamma-irradiated ARD soils and grass soils served as control soils. The aim was to develop a diagnostic tool for the early detection of ARD. In fine roots of first to third order, we assessed the root structure, the root hair density, the cellular damages in the outer layers, and the cell vitality. After only two weeks in ARD soil, 'M26' reacted with cell necroses and blackening in a characteristic pattern, impaired root hair development, and low cell vitality. These symptoms were confirmed in Malus domestica 'Bittenfelder' and Malus-hybrid B63. Root systems grown in gamma-irradiated soils were almost symptom-free while those from grass soils showed different and only minor alterations. Thus, we suggest selected fine root symptoms to be used for an early diagnosis of ARD, e.g. in plant breeding selections and soil surveys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据