4.5 Review

The role of autophagy in cardiac hypertrophy

期刊

ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 491-500

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/abbs/gmw025

关键词

autophagy; cardiac hypertrophy; cardiac function; cell signaling; autophagic flux

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470434, 81270420, 81470435, 30971169]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation [14JJ3102]
  3. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Project [2015RS4040]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560647, 2015T80875]
  5. Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Hunan Province [201578]
  6. Health and Family Planning Commission of Hunan Province [B2015-48]
  7. Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province [2008-244]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy is conserved in nature from lower eukaryotes to mammals and is an important self-cannibalizing, degradative process that contributes to the elimination of superfluous materials. Cardiac hypertrophy is primarily characterized by excess protein synthesis, increased cardiomyocyte size, and thickened ventricular walls and is a major risk factor that promotes arrhythmia and heart failure. In recent years, cardiomyocyte autophagy has been considered to play a role in controlling the hypertrophic response. However, the beneficial or aggravating role of cardiomyocyte autophagy in cardiac hypertrophy remains controversial. The exact mechanism of cardiomyocyte autophagy in cardiac hypertrophy requires further study. In this review, we summarize the controversies associated with autophagy in cardiac hypertrophy and provide insights into the role of autophagy in the development of cardiac hypertrophy. We conclude that future studies should emphasize the relationship between autophagy and the different stages of cardiac hypertrophy, as well as the autophagic flux and selective autophagy. Autophagy will be a potential therapeutic target for cardiac hypertrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据