4.4 Article

An analysis of the farmers contractual preferences in process innovation implementation: A case study in the Italian poultry context

期刊

BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL
卷 121, 期 2, 页码 426-440

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-12-2017-0697

关键词

Process innovation; Adaptation; Transaction costs; Broiler

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider how farmers cope with the uncertainty-related broiler process innovation in long-term contractual relationships. Design/methodology/approach This paper conceptualizes the process innovation implementation in terms of governance structure adaptation. The focus of the study is on the property and decision rights combination in process innovation implementation. It is argued that this approach highlights a key aspect of the nexus between governance mode and innovation within inter-firms relationships. Findings The results first show that the allocation of the decision rights between the farmer and the processor explains the process innovation implementation and, second, that the farmer contractual preferences are caused by the expected costs of the adaptation. Third, estimates of transaction and production costs variations are proposed. Research limitations/implications This study considers only the uncertainty stemming from the process innovation, whereas further uncertainty sources may influence the contract negotiation. Second, the lack of sample representativeness requires further information to be gathered. Finally, the investigation could be developed by modeling the farmer-processor negotiation. Practical implications The results indicate that effective governance structures in poultry production should give room to the adaptation in order to facilitate process innovation. Originality/value To conceptualize the process innovation implementation as an adaptation of the governance structure strengthens the knowledge of innovation in the sector context and contributes to the extent of the applied field of transaction cost economics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据