4.7 Article

Nitrous oxide cycling in the water column and sediments of the oxygen minimum zone, eastern subtropical North Pacific, Southern California, and Northern Mexico (23°N-34°N)

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 119, 期 5, 页码 3158-3170

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JC009580

关键词

nitrous oxide; nitrate; hypoxia; greenhouse gas emissions; nitrogen cycle

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-093000, OCE-0727123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying sources and sinks of N2O can illuminate N cycling processes in marine systems, particularly where changes in dissolved O2 can lead to changes in N cycling pathways (i.e., nitrification versus denitrification). We measured N2O and NO3- concentration and their stable isotope ratios (15N and 18O) in the water column and sediments of the oxygen minimum zone in the nearshore eastern subtropical North Pacific (23 degrees N-34 degrees N). Atmospheric efflux of N2O ranged from 2.2 to 17.9 mol m-2 d-1 or about 2-20 times higher than in oxygenated regions of the North Pacific. Surface waters were a source of 15N-depleted and 18O-enriched N2O to the atmosphere, indicating a bacterial, not archaeal, nitrification N2O source. Stable isotopes indicated that nitrification in both surface and intermediate waters (approximate to 0-200 m) was the major source of N2O in this study area, with denitrification acting as a small N2O sink in strongly O2-depleted waters. Denitrification had a larger impact on observed patterns of N2O and NO3- concentrations and isotope ratios in the southern oxygen minimum zone. Sediments were generally neutral or a weak sink for N2O, with only one site (Soledad basin) showing a positive efflux of +3.5 +/- 1.0 mol N2O-N m-2 d-1. Sediment fluxes of N2O at all sites were several orders of magnitude smaller than fluxes of dinitrogen, nitrate, and ammonium measured in previous studies and did not appear to impact water column N2O concentrations. N2O was less than 0.1% of the N2 efflux from sedimentary denitrification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据