4.7 Article

Roles of breaking waves and Langmuir circulation in the surface boundary layer of a coastal ocean

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 118, 期 10, 页码 5173-5187

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgrc.20387

关键词

wave breaking; Langmuir circulation; ocean mixed layer; large eddy simulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41206015, 41176016]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB403501, 2012CB417402]
  3. NSFC [41121064]
  4. Office of Naval Research [N00014-02-1-0659]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breaking waves and Langmuir circulation are two important turbulent processes in the wind-driven upper ocean. To investigate their roles in generating turbulence in the surface boundary layer of a coastal ocean, a large eddy simulation model is used to simulate the turbulence measurements collected at the Martha's Vineyard Coastal Observatory's Air-Sea Interaction Tower, during the Coupled Boundary Layers and Air-Sea Transfer (CBLAST) experiment in 2003. The model provides reasonable predictions for the vertical profiles of vertical velocity variance, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), energy dissipation rates, and heat flux. It shows breaking waves dominating turbulence generation near the ocean surface and turbulent large eddies characteristic of Langmuir circulation deeper in the water column. Diagnostic analysis of TKE budget in the model shows a dominant balance between turbulent transport and dissipation near the surface and a dominant balance between shear production and dissipation at deeper depths. Although the Stokes production is a significant term in the TKE budget balance near the surface, it is smaller than shear production. The turbulent transport is large in the near-surface zone and is still significant in the region affected by Langmuir circulation. These results are in agreement with a conclusion inferred from a recent analysis of the near-surface turbulence measurements at the CBLAST site.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据