4.6 Article

Nanocoatings containing sulfated polysaccharides prepared by layer-by-layer assembly as models to study cell-material interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 1, 期 35, 页码 4406-4418

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3tb20624f

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [REGPOT-CT2012-316331-POLARIS]
  2. European Union/EFDR through the POCTEP project [0330_IBER-OMARE_1_P]
  3. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/70107/2010, SFRH/BPD/34704/2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The understanding of both cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell-material interactions is crucial for the success of implantable biomaterials including tissue engineering devices. ECM is rich in sulfated and aminated glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans. The development of synthetic models containing those chemical groups is thus of major interest. Thin coatings of polysaccharides with controlled sulfur and nitrogen contents were developed by layer-by-layer assembly. In particular, the multilayers were prepared by assembling chitosan with kappa-, iota- and lambda-carrageenan (increasing sulfur content). The nanostructured multilayers were characterized by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D), atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), water contact angle, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and used as models to study the effect of the sulfate groups over the behavior of osteoblast-like cells. The biomimetic coatings increased the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and proliferation compared with unmodified polycaprolactone surfaces. Biomineralization increase with the presence of the coatings is significantly higher on iota-carrageenan coatings, suggesting that the sulfate groups may interact positively with molecules involved in the osteoblastic activity as it occurs in the natural ECM. The developed nanocoatings can constitute an interesting model to understand the biological influence of the sulfate and amine groups existing on the surface of biomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据