4.7 Review

Telomere regulation in pluripotent stem cells

期刊

PROTEIN & CELL
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 194-202

出版社

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1007/s13238-014-0028-1

关键词

telomere; pluripotent stem cells; alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT); regulators

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2010CB945401, 2012CB911201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371508, 31000611, 91019020]
  3. Introduced Innovative R&D Team of Guangdong Province [201001Y0104687244]
  4. Zhujiang Program of Science and Technology Nova in Guangzhou [2011J2200082]
  5. 985 project foundation of Sun Yat-sen University [33000-3281303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) have the potential to produce any types of cells from all three basic germ layers and the capacity to self-renew and proliferate indefinitely in vitro. The two main types of PSCs, embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), share common features such as colony morphology, high expression of Oct4 and Nanog, and strong alkaline phosphatase activity. In recent years, increasing evidences suggest that telomere length represents another important internal factor in maintaining stem cell pluripotency. Telomere length homeostasis and its structural integrity help to protect chromosome ends from recombination, end fusion, and DNA damage responses, ensuring the divisional ability of mammalian cells. PSCs generally exhibit high telomerase activity to maintain their extremely long and stable telomeres, and emerging data indicate the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway may play an important role in telomere functions too. Such characteristics are likely key to their abilities to differentiate into diverse cell types in vivo. In this review, we will focus on the function and regulation of telomeres in ESCs and iPSCs, thereby shedding light on the importance of telomere length to pluripotency and the mechanisms that regulate telomeres in PSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据