4.4 Article

Preparation of SnS2 thin films by close-spaced sublimation at different source temperatures

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 534, 期 -, 页码 28-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.072

关键词

Tin sulfide; Thin film; Close-spaced sublimation; Source temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51072043]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CBA00700]
  3. Anhui Province Science and Technology Plan Project of China [2010AKND0794]
  4. College Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [KJ2010A266]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the recent years, a number of methods had been reported for preparing tin disulfide (SnS2) films. Compared with the other available methods, close-spaced sublimation (CSS) was reported as a simple, cost-effective, and non-wet thin film deposition technique. The present research aimed to demonstrate a CSS approach to prepare SnS2 thin films using SnS2 powder as a source. The influence of the source temperature on the chemical composition, crystal structure, surface morphology, and optical band gap of tin sulfide thin films was systemically investigated by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, and ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra, respectively. By the CSS technique, SnS2 thin films were prepared at the source temperature of 580 C, and SnS2 crystals showed a characteristic of a preferred orientation along (001) plane, possessing hexagonal phase and sheet appearance. The optical band gap of SnS2 thin films was calculated to be 2.08 eV. At the source temperature of 650 degrees C, the tin sulfide thin films mainly consisted of Sn2S3 along with other phases and exhibited rod appearance. Therefore, it was found that the optimal source temperature for the preparation of SnS2 thin films was 580 degrees C using the CSS method. Further studies are recommended to optimize and apply this thin film in solar cells. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据