4.7 Article

Correlations between disease severity, glucosinolate profiles and total phenolics and Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris inoculation of different Brassicaceae

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 129, 期 3, 页码 503-510

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.009

关键词

Vegetable Brassica; Plant pathogenic bacteria; Phytochemicals; Isothiocyanates

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [POCI/AGR/56573/2004, SFRH/BD/18586/2004]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/18586/2004, POCI/AGR/56573/2004] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many Brassicaceae species are economically important crops and Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc), the causal agent of black rot, is considered one of the most important necrotrophic plant bacterial diseases occurring worldwide on these and many other crops. Therefore identifying resistance mechanisms and genes is crucial. Researchers continue to investigate the role of phytochemicals (plant secondary metabolites) in protecting plants against diseases and pathogens. Glucosinolates (GLS), and more specifically their hydrolysis products, are known to have various biological effects including antimicrobial activity. From the positive results of initial in vitro studies with Xcc and other pathogenic bacteria new experiments were designed to evaluate the possible in planta role of GLS, and also phenolics, in the interaction with Xcc. The in planta studies, with various Brassicaceae seedlings, have shown a correlation between GLS profiles, and therefore the subsequent hydrolysis products, and the inhibition of Xcc growth. There were no significant correlations between Xcc infection and total phenolics. Positive correlations were found between specific and total GLS contents and the severity of disease. Further in vitro and in planta studies need to be performed to evaluate the role of GLS and other defense mechanisms in Xcc and other important bacterial infections of Brassicaceae crops. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据