4.7 Article

Factors affecting mango (Mangifera indica L.) protoplast isolation and culture

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 130, 期 1, 页码 214-221

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.046

关键词

Alginate; Kensington Pride; Mangifera indica L.; Mango; Proembryonic masses; Protoplast culture

资金

  1. Iranian Agricultural Research Organization
  2. School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The major factors influencing protoplast isolation and culture of mango (Mangifera indica L) cv. Kensington Pride were investigated. The resultant protocol was used to compare plating efficiency among 4 mango cultivars. Most responses differed between proembryonic masses (PEMs) and leaf sources. Protoplast yields of 15.22 x 10(6) g(-1) from PEMs and 8.68 x 10(6) g(-1) from greenhouse-derived leaves were obtained in a solution of 0.7 M mannitol CPW plus 1.5% cellulase, 1% hemicellulase and 0.75% macerozyme for PEMs or 0.5 M mannitol CPW plus 1.5% cellulose, 1% hemicellulase and 1.5% macerozyme for leaves. Culture in Ca-alginate beads with initial plating densities (IPD) of 2.5 x 10(4) Pp mL(-1) for PEMs and 2.5 x 10(5) for leaves gave the highest plating efficiencies (FPE). For PEMs 1 mg L-1 2,4-D and 3.5 mg L-1 kinetin gave an FPE of 2.85% whereas lower kinetin (2 mg L-1) plus 0.5 mg L-1 6-BAP was most effective for leaves (FPE of 2.12%). Most protoplast mortality occurred during the first week of culture and was more severe in liquid culture. In Ca-alginate beads, protoplast survival at 14 days was higher for PEMs (30%) than leaf (21%) as was the frequency of cell division (17.6% compared to 13.6%). PEMs protoplasts continued development through embryogenesis to in vitro plantlet regeneration whereas leaf protoplasts underwent cell division up to 40-cell colonies but failed to proceed further. For PEMs, polyembryonic cvs. Kensington Pride and Keow Savoey produced higher FPE (1.95%) than monoembryonic cvs. Tommy Atkins and Keitt (1.75%). There was no effect of cultivar for leaf protoplasts. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据