4.7 Article

Focal adhesion kinase and reactive oxygen species contribute to the persistent fibrotic phenotype of lesional scleroderma fibroblasts

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 2146-2154

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes234

关键词

adhesion; integrin; ROS; CCN2; FAK; alpha-SMA; collagen

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Heath Research (CIHR)
  2. Scleroderma Society of Ontario
  3. Scleroderma Society
  4. Arthritis Research Foundation
  5. CIHR Strategic Training Initiative in Health Research/Joint Motion Program
  6. Canadian Scleroderma Research Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Fibrotic diseases such as SSc (systemic sclerosis, scleroderma) are characterized by the abnormal presence of the myofibroblast, a specialized type of fibroblast that overexpresses the highly contractile protein alpha-smooth muscle actin. Myofibroblasts display excessive adhesive properties and hence exert a potent mechanical force. We aim to identify the precise contribution of adhesive signalling, which requires integrin-mediated activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/src, to fibrogenic gene expression in normal and fibrotic SSc fibroblasts. Methods. We subject either FAK wild-type and knockout fibroblasts or normal and SSc fibroblasts treated with FAK/src inhibitors to real-time polymerase chain, western blot, cell migration and collagen gel contraction analyses. Results. FAK operates downstream of both integrin beta 1 and reactive oxygen species (ROS) to promote the expression of genes involved in matrix production and remodelling, including CCN2, alpha-smooth muscle actin and type I collagen. Blocking either FAK/src with PP2 or ROS with N-acetyl cysteine alleviates the elevated contractile and migratory capability of lesional SSc dermal fibroblasts. Conclusions. Excessive adhesive signalling is intimately involved with the fibrotic phenotype of lesional SSc fibroblasts; blocking adhesive signalling or ROS generation may be beneficial in controlling the fibrosis observed in SSc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据