4.7 Article

ACT: A leaf BRDF model taking into account the azimuthal anisotropy of monocotyledonous leaf surface

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 112-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.006

关键词

Sorghum; Wheat; Leaf; Surface roughness; BRDF; BRF; Reflectance; Conoscope; Azimuthal anisotropy; Optical properties; Goniometer; Physical model; Refractive index

资金

  1. Programme National de Teledetection Spatiale
  2. Arvalis-Institut du Vegetal through Alexis Comar PhD grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leaf reflectance of monocotyledons generally displays a strong azimuthal anisotropy due to the longitudinal orientation of the veins. The Cook and Torrance (CT) bidirectional reflectance distribution function model was adapted to account for this distinctive feature. The resulting ACT (Anisotropic Cook and Torrance) model is based on the decomposition of the roughness parameter into two perpendicular components. It is evaluated on sorghum (Sorghum halepense) and wheat (Triticum durum) leaf BRF (Bidirectional Reflectance Factor) measurements acquired using a conoscope system. Results show that the ACT model fits the measurements better than azimuthally isotropic surface models: the root mean square error computed over all the BRF measurements for both leaves decreases from approximate to 0.06 for the Lambertian model to approximate to 0.04 for the CT model and down to approximate to 0.03 for the ACT model. The adjusted value of the refraction index is plausible (n approximate to 1.32) for both leaves while the retrieved roughness values perpendicular to the veins (sorghum = 0.56; wheat = 0.46) is about two times larger than that parallel to the veins (sorghum = 0.27; wheat = 0.18). Nonetheless, the observed residual discrepancies between the ACT model simulations and the measurements may be explained mainly by the Lambertian assumption of the volume scattering. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据