4.6 Article

NICE guidance on antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infective endocarditis: a survey of clinicians' attitudes

期刊

QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 106, 期 3, 页码 237-243

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcs235

关键词

-

资金

  1. Somerset Heart Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Since the introduction of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline (CG064) in 2008 recommending cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) against infective endocarditis (IE), low level prescribing persists in the UK and is a potential reason why there has been no significant change in the general upward trend in cases of IF. Aim: To undertake a survey of dentists (Ds), cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons (C/CTSs) and infection specialists (ISs) to determine why this might be the case. Design: Internet questionnaire-based survey. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed by email to specialists via UK national societies. Results: A total of 1168 responses were received. All the specialist groups are aware of the guideline (99%). Ds are broadly satisfied, whereas C/CTSs are not. Most Ds follow the NICE guidance (87%), whereas many C/CTSs (39%) do not; ISs adopt a middle course (56%). Even amongst Ds, a significant proportion believe that patients with a prosthetic heart valve (25%) or previous history of IE (38%) should receive AP. A total of 36% of Ds have prescribed AP since March 2008 and many have undertaken procedures where AP has been prescribed by someone else. The majority of respondents (65%) feel that more evidence is required, preferably in the form of a randomized controlled trial. Conclusions: Many patients perceived to be at high risk of IF are still receiving AP in conflict with current NICE guidance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据