4.3 Article

The impact of nutrition education with and without a school garden on knowledge, vegetable intake and preferences and quality of school life among primary-school students

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 1931-1940

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010000959

关键词

School garden; Vegetable; Primary school; Intervention

资金

  1. Hunter Medical Research Institute
  2. Coles community

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the impact of school garden-enhanced nutrition education (NE) on children's fruit and vegetable consumption, vegetable preferences, fruit and vegetable knowledge and quality of school life. Design: Quasi-experimental 10-week intervention with nutrition education and garden (NE&G), NE only and control groups. Fruit and vegetable knowledge, vegetable preferences (willingness to taste and taste ratings), fruit and vegetable consumption (24 h recall X 2) and quality of school life (QoSL) were measured at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Setting: Two primary schools in the Hunter Region, New South Wales, Australia. Subjects: A total of 127 students in Grades 5 and 6 (11-12 years old; 54% boys). Results: Relative to controls, significant between-group differences were found for NE&G and NE students for overall willingness to taste vegetables (P < 0.001) and overall taste ratings of vegetables (P < 0.001). A treatment effect was found for the NE&G group for: ability to identify vegetables (P < 0.001); willingness to taste capsicum (P = 0.04), broccoli (P = 0.01), tomato (P < 0.001) and pea (P = 0.02); and student preference to eat broccoli (P < 0.001) and pea (P < 0.001) as a snack. No group-by-time differences were found for vegetable intake (P = 0.22), fruit intake (P = 0.23) or QoSL (P = 0.98). Conclusions: School gardens can impact positively on primary-school students' willingness to taste vegetables and their vegetable taste ratings, but given the complexity of dietary behaviour change, more comprehensive strategies are required to increase vegetable intake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据