4.6 Article

Syntheses, characterization, in vitro antiglycation and DPPH radical scavenging activities of isatin salicylhydrazidehydrazone and its Mn (II), Co (II), Ni (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II) metal complexes

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 2262-2269

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.02.015

关键词

Isatin hydrazone; Metal complexes; TG/DTA; Anti-oxidant; Anti-glycation

资金

  1. University of Sindh, Jamshoro
  2. Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2-Hydroxy salicylhydrazide isatin hydrazone (L) and its Mn (II), Co (II), Ni (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II), metal complexes were synthesized. H-1 NMR, UV-Vis, IR spectroscopy and elemental (CHN/S) analysis techniques were applied for characterization. TG/DTA techniques revealed that all the synthetic compounds are thermally stable up to 300 degrees C. They were found non-electrolytes in nature. Furthermore, all these complexes were evaluated for antiglycation and DPPH radical scavenging activities. They showed varying degree of activity with IC50 values between 168.23 and 269.0 mu M in antiglycation and 29.63-57.71 mu M in DPPH radical scavenging activity. Mn (II), Co (II), Ni (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II), metal complexes showed good antiglycation as well as DPPH radical scavenging activity. The IC50 values for antiglycation activity are 168.23 +/- 2.37, 234.27 +/- 4.33, 257.1 +/- 6.43, 267.7 +/- 8.43, 269.0 +/- 8.56 Ni for Co, Zn, Mn, Cu, and Ni complexes, respectively, while IC50 value were found to be 29.63 +/- 2.76, 31.13 +/- 1.41, 35.16 +/- 2.45, 43.53 +/- 3.12, 57.71 +/- 2.61 mu M for Cu, Zn, Mn, Co and Ni complexes, respectively, for DPPH radical scavenging activity. These synthesized metal complexes were found to be better active than standards Rutin (IC50 = 294.46 mu M) for anti-glycation, and tert-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole (IC50= 44.7 mu M) for DPPH radical scavenging activity. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据