4.7 Article

Effectiveness of peer-led education on knowledge, attitude and risk behavior practices related to HIV among students at a Malaysian public university - A randomized controlled trial

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 55, 期 5, 页码 505-510

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.09.003

关键词

HIV/AIDS; Risk behavioral interventions; Randomized controlled trial; University students

资金

  1. Research University Grant Scheme (RUGS) by the Universiti Putra Malaysia [04-03-08-0464RU]
  2. Malaysian Health Promotion Board

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Develop, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-led education program related to HIV/AIDS among university students. Method. Design: randomized controlled trial with 276 university students at Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang in 2011. Intervention: A peer-led education program on HIV prevention by university students. Outcome: differences in knowledge, attitude and risk behavior practices related to HIV between baselines, immediate follow-up after intervention and after three months. Results. Significant improvement in sound knowledge in the intervention group as compared to the control group (Odds ratio, 1.75; 95% CI 1.01, 3.00; p = 0.04) and improvement in good attitude related to HIV (Odds ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.37, 3.61; p = 0.01). The odds of high substance risk behavior was significantly reduced in the intervention group as compared to the control group (Odds ratio 0.07; 95% CI 0.02, 034; p = 0.01). The association between good knowledge and intervention was modified by the different time points (baseline, immediately after intervention and 3 months after intervention), ethnicity and gender. Conclusion. Peer-led education program in HIV prevention improves knowledge, attitude and substance risk behavior. Changes in sexual risk behavior may require a longer follow-up. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据