4.5 Article

Covalently and ionically crosslinked sulfonated poly(arylene ether ketone)s as proton exchange membranes

期刊

POLYMER BULLETIN
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 1369-1386

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-011-0638-1

关键词

Covalently and ionically crosslinked sulfonated poly(arylene ether ketone); Proton exchange membrane; Quinoxaline groups; Methanol permeability

资金

  1. Key Technologies R&D Program of Shaanxi Province [2009K06-08]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1070]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK200902002, GK201002002]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Scholars, Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of covalently and ionically crosslinked sulfonated poly(arylene ether ketone)s (SPAEKs) were prepared via the cyclocondensation reaction of crosslinkable SPAEKs with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine to form quinoxaline groups, where crosslinkable SPAEKs were synthesized by copolymerization of 4,4'-biphenol with 2,6-difluorobenzil, 4,4'-difluorobenzophenone, and 5,5'-carbonyl-bis(2-fluorobenzene sulfonate). The SPAEK membranes had high mechanical properties and the isotropic membrane swelling. The covalent and ionical crosslinking significantly improved the membrane performance, i.e., the crosslinked membranes showed the lower membrane dimensional change, lower methanol permeability, and higher oxidative stability than the corresponding uncrosslinked membranes, with keeping the reasonably high proton conductivity. The crosslinked membrane (CK3) with measured ion exchange capacity of 1.62 mequiv g(-1) displayed a reasonably high proton conductivity of 110 mS/cm with water uptake of 33 wt% at 80 A degrees C, and exhibited a low methanol permeability of 1.7 x 10(-7) cm(2) s(-1) for 32 wt% methanol solution at 25 A degrees C. The covalently and ionically crosslinked SPAEK membranes have potential for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells and direct methanol fuel cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据