4.6 Article

Cellular FRET-Biosensors to Detect Membrane Targeting Inhibitors of N-Myristoylated Proteins

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066425

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia [569652]
  2. ARC, Australia [DP1094080]
  3. Academy of Finland fellowship [252381]
  4. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  5. Cancer Society of Finland
  6. Marie-Curie Reintegration [268271]
  7. graduate school, National Doctoral Programme in Informational and Structural Biology (ISB)
  8. Australian Research Council [DP1094080] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  9. Academy of Finland (AKA) [252381, 252381] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  10. Cancer Foundation Finland sr [100073] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hundreds of eukaryotic signaling proteins require myristoylation to functionally associate with intracellular membranes. N-myristoyl transferases (NMT) responsible for this modification are established drug targets in cancer and infectious diseases. Here we describe NANOMS (NANOclustering and Myristoylation Sensors), biosensors that exploit the FRET resulting from plasma membrane nanoclustering of myristoylated membrane targeting sequences of G alpha(12), Yes- or Src-kinases fused to fluorescent proteins. When expressed in mammalian cells, NANOMS report on loss of membrane anchorage due to chemical or genetic inhibition of myristoylation e. g. by blocking NMT and methionine-aminopeptidase (Met-AP). We used Yes-NANOMS to assess inhibitors of NMT and a cherry-picked compound library of putative Met-AP inhibitors. Thus we successfully confirmed the activity of DDD85646 and fumagillin in our cellular assay. The developed assay is unique in its ability to identify modulators of signaling protein nanoclustering, and is amenable to high throughput screening for chemical or genetic inhibitors of functional membrane anchorage of myristoylated proteins in mammalian cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据