4.6 Article

Hepatic, gastric, and intestinal first-pass effects of vitexin in rats

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY
卷 52, 期 8, 页码 967-971

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2013.874464

关键词

HPLC; pharmacokinetics; verapamil

资金

  1. Shenyang Science and Technology Planning Foundation, China [F13-194-9-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Recent research has demonstrated that vitexin exhibits a prominent first-pass effect. In this light, it is necessary to investigate the causes of this distinct first-pass effect. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate hepatic, gastric, and intestinal first-pass effects of vitexin in rats and, furthermore, to investigate the role of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) in the absorption and secretion of vitexin in the duodenum. Materials and methods: Vitexin was infused into rats intravenously, intraportally, intraduodenally, and intragastrically (30 mg/kg). In addition, verapamil (50 mg/kg), a common substrate/inhibitor of P-gp and CYP3A, was also instilled with vitexin into the duodenum to investigate the regulatory action of P-gp and CYP3A. The plasma concentrations of vitexin were measured by the HPLC method using hesperidin as an internal standard. Results: The hepatic, gastric, and intestinal first-pass effects of vitexin in rats were 5.2%, 31.3%, and 94.1%, respectively. In addition, the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC) of the vitexin plus verapamil group and of the normal saline group was 44.9 and 39.8 mu g min/mL,respectively. Discussion and conclusion: The intestinal first-pass effect of vitexin was considerable, and gastric and hepatic first-pass effects also contribute to the low absolute oral bioavailability of vitexin. The AUC of the vitexin plus verapamil group was slightly higher than that of the vitexin plus normal saline group (by approximately 1.13-fold), suggesting that verapamil does not play an important role in the absorption and secretion of vitexin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据