期刊名
PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY

PHARM BIOL

ISSN / eISSN
1388-0209 / 1744-5116
目标和范围
Pharmaceutical Biology will publish manuscripts describing the discovery, methods for discovery, description, analysis characterization, and production/isolation (including sources and surveys) of biologically-active chemicals or other substances, drugs, pharmaceutical products, or preparations utilized in systems of traditional medicine.

Topics may generally encompass any facet of natural product research related to pharmaceutical biology. Papers dealing with agents or topics related to natural product drugs are also appropriate (e.g., semi-synthetic derivatives). Manuscripts will be published as reviews, perspectives, regular research articles, and short communications. The primary criteria for acceptance and publication are scientific rigor and potential to advance the field.
研究方向

医学实验技术

药学

植物科学

CiteScore
5.60 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Medicine - Complementary and Alternative Medicine Q1 #18/97
Medicine - Pharmaceutical Science Q2 #62/171
Medicine - Pharmacology Q2 #126/301
Medicine - Drug Discovery Q2 #72/156
Medicine - Molecular Medicine Q3 #91/171
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY - SCIE Q2
PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY - SCIE Q2
PLANT SCIENCES - SCIE Q1
H-index
53
出版国家或地区
NETHERLANDS
出版商
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
出版周期
Bimonthly
出版年份
1998
年文章数
215
Open Access
YES
通讯方式
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
I regret not checking the comments on letpub before submitting. If I had checked, I definitely wouldn't have submitted it. I submitted it in mid-November and it was sent for external review at the end of December. After a month of external review, I received two minor revision suggestions, but the editor rejected it. One of the reviewers' comments was very strange. If it weren't for the fact that I had this article proofread by a professional editing agency, I would have believed his "poorly written" comment.

In short, the quality of the published articles is just average. I rushed to graduate and submitted it to a lower-tier journal. Now, I will have to make some changes and continue to submit to high-ranking journals in the food industry without relying on this article for graduation.

I do not recommend submitting to this journal as it does not seem very professional.
2023-01-24
Trash editor, everyone please do not submit! I submitted in May, and had to revise three times according to the reviewer's suggestions. All three reviewers approved and agreed to publish it. However, this ridiculous editor rejected it based on the opinion of one reviewer. I already revised it and the reviewers approved it. Truly frustrating, encountering such a person is really unlucky. It wasted six months of my time. The epitome of garbage!
2022-11-19

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now