4.7 Article

Nrf2/Maf-binding-site-containing functional Cyp6a2 allele is associated with DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 70, 期 7, 页码 1048-1058

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3645

关键词

Cyp6a2; DDT resistance; frameshift mutation; long terminal repeat; Nrf2/Maf binding site; overexpression

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2012CB114103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30870342]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Increased insecticide detoxification mediated by cytochrome P450s is a common mechanism of insecticide resistance. Although Cyp6a2 has been observed to be overexpressed in many 4,4'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT)-resistant strains of Drosophila melanogaster, how Cyp6a2 is regulated and whether its overproduction confers DDT resistance remain elusive. RESULTS: Molecular analysis identified five Cyp6a2 alleles (Cyp6a2(Canton-S-1), Cyp6a2(Canton-S-2), Cyp6a2(91-C), Cyp6a2(91-R) and Cyp6a2(Wisconsin-WD)) from four D. melanogaster strains, notably differing in the presence or absence of an intact Nrf2/Maf (a transcription factor) binding site in the 5'-promoter core region, a 'G1410' frameshift deletion mutation in the heme-binding region and a long terminal repeat (LTR) of transposable element 17.6 in the 3'-untranslated region (UTR). Linkage analysis confirmed that DDT resistance was genetically linked to a Nrf2/Maf-binding-site-containing, LTR-lacking functional allele of Cyp6a2 (Cyp6a2(91-R)). The qRT-PCR results showed that overexpression of functional Cyp6a2 was consistently associated with DDT resistance. Luciferase reporter gene assays revealed that an intact Nrf2/Maf binding site in the 5'-promoter core region enhanced the constitutive transcription of Cyp6a2. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the Nrf2/Maf binding-site-containing functional Cyp6a2 allele is associated with DDT resistance in the D. melanogaster strains under study. (C) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据