4.8 Article

Antibody-directed coupling of endoglin and MMP-14 is a key mechanism for endoglin shedding and deregulation of TGF-β signaling

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 33, 期 30, 页码 3970-3979

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.386

关键词

endoglin; soluble endoglin; TRC105; angiogenesis; TGF-beta

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R00 HL103791]
  2. College of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacology
  3. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, at The Ohio State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endoglin is a transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) coreceptor that serves as a prognostic, diagnostic and therapeutic vascular target in human cancer. A number of endoglin ectodomain-targeting antibodies (Abs) can effectively suppress both normal and tumor-associated angiogenesis, but their molecular actions remain poorly characterized. Here we define a key mechanism for TRACON105 (TRC105), a humanized monoclonal Ab in clinical trials for treatment of advanced or metastatic tumors. TRC105, along with several other endoglin Abs tested, enhance endoglin shedding through direct coupling of endoglin and the membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14 at the cell surface to release the antiangiogenic factor, soluble endoglin (sEng). In addition to this coupling process, endoglin shedding is further amplified by increased MMP-14 expression that requires TRC105 concentration-dependent c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation. There were also notable counterbalancing effects on canonical Smad signaling in which TRC105 abrogated both the steady-state and TGF-beta-induced Smad1/5/8 activation while augmenting Smad2/3 activation. Interestingly, TRC105-induced sEng and aberrant Smad signaling resulted in an excessive migratory response through enhanced stress fiber formation and disruption of endothelial cell-cell junctions. Collectively, our study defines endoglin shedding and deregulated TGF-beta signaling during migration as major mechanisms by which TRC105 inhibits angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据