4.5 Review

Refeeding syndrome: Treatment considerations based on collective analysis of literature case reports

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 156-167

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.11.017

关键词

Refeeding syndrome; Nutritional support; Micronutrient supplementation; Parenteral nutrition; Anorexia nervosa; Refeeding in anorexia nervosa; Refeeding complications; Hypophosphatemia; Arrhythmia; Nutritional support

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Refeeding syndrome (RFS) represents a group of clinical findings that occur in severely malnourished individuals undergoing nutritional support Cardiac arrhythmias, multisystem organ dysfunction, and death are the most severe symptoms observed As the cachectic body attempts to reverse its adaptation to the starved state in response to the nutritional load, symptoms Jesuit from fluid and electrolyte imbalances, with hypophosphatemia playing a central role. Because guidelines for feeding the malnourished patient at risk for refeeding syndrome is scarce, we have provided management recommendations based on the knowledge derived from a collection of reported English literature cases of the RFS A MEDLINE search using keywords including refeeding syndrome, and refeeding hypophosphatemia was performed References from initial cases were utilized for more literature on the subject We have emphasized the continued importance of managing patients at risk for RFS. compared how management of the severely malnourished patients have evolved over time, and provided comprehensive clinical guidelines based on the sum of experience documented in the case reports for the purpose of supplementing the guidelines available Based on our review, the most effective means of preventing or treating RFS were the following recognizing the patients at risk. providing adequate electrolyte. vitamin, and micronutrient supplementation, careful fluid resuscitation; cautious and gradual enemy restoration, and monitoring of critical laboratory indices (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据