4.4 Article

Glutamate-induced free radical formation in rat brain synaptosomes is not dependent on intrasynaptosomal mitochondria membrane potential

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 513, 期 2, 页码 238-242

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.051

关键词

Synaptosomes; Glutamate; ROS; NADPH oxidase; Mitochondria; NMDA

资金

  1. Physiological Society on Centres of excellence scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glutamate induces reactive oxygen species formation (ROS) in neurons. Free radicals can potentially be synthesized by NADPH oxidase or mitochondria. The primary source of ROS origin has yet to be identified. In addition, pro-oxidant action of glutamate receptors on neuronal presynaptic terminals is still not characterized. We investigated the influence of glutamate and agonists of its ionotropic receptors on ROS formation detected by fluorescent dye DCFDA in rat brain synaptosomes. Glutamate in concentration 10 and 100 mu M led to an increase of probe fluorescence pointing to free radical accumulation. This effect was mimicked by 100 mu M of NMDA or 100 mu M of kainate. Glutamate-induced ROS formation was sensitive to NMDA inhibitors MK-801 (10 mu M), NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor L.-NAME (100 mu M) and NADPH oxidase inhibitors DPI (30 mu M) and not affected by mitochondrial uncoupler CCCP (10 mu M) and mitochondrial toxins rotenone (10 mu M) + oligomycin (5 mu g/ml). We also showed that 100 mu M of glutamate leads to a decrease of intrasynaptosomal mitochondrial potential monitored by fluorescent dye Rhodamine-123. Hence, the depolarization of intrasynaptosomal mitochondria is not a primary cause of glutamate-induced ROS formation in neuronal presynaptic terminals. Activation of NMDA receptors might be responsible for a certain part of glutamate pro-oxidant action. Most likely, sources of glutamate-induced ROS formation in neuronal presynaptic terminals are NADPH oxidase and NOS activation. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据