4.7 Review

Natural compounds regulate energy metabolism by the modulating the activity of lipid-sensing nuclear receptors

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 20-33

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201200522

关键词

Adipose tissue; Metabolic syndrome; Natural compounds; Nuclear receptors; Obesity

资金

  1. Research and Development Projects for Application in Promoting New Policies Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, Japan
  2. Research and Development Program for New Bio-industry Initiatives, Japan
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [22228001, 22380075, 24688015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity causes excess fat accumulation in various tissues, most notoriously in the adipose tissue, along with other insulin-responsive organs such as skeletal muscle and the liver, which predisposes an individual to the development of metabolic abnormalities. The molecular mechanisms underlying obesity-induced metabolic abnormalities have not been completely elucidated; however, in recent years, the search for therapies to prevent the development of obesity and obesity-associated metabolic disorders has increased. It is known that several nuclear receptors, when activated by specific ligands, regulate carbohydrate and lipid metabolism at the transcriptional level. The expression of lipid metabolism-related enzymes is directly regulated by the activity of various nuclear receptors via their interaction with specific response elements in promoters of those genes. Many natural compounds act as ligands of nuclear receptors and regulate carbohydrate and lipid metabolism by regulating the activities of these nuclear receptors. In this review, we describe our current knowledge of obesity, the role of lipid-sensing nuclear receptors in energy metabolism, and several examples of food factors that act as agonists or antagonists of nuclear receptors, which may be useful for the management of obesity and the accompanying energy metabolism abnormalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据