4.7 Article

Use of folic acid supplements in early pregnancy in relation to maternal plasma levels in week 18 of pregnancy

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 653-660

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201200116

关键词

Folic acid; Maternal report; Periconceptional; Plasma; Pregnancy cohort

资金

  1. Norwegian Ministry of Health
  2. NIH/NIEHS [N01-ES-85433]
  3. NIH/NINDS [1 UO1 NS 047537-01]
  4. Norwegian Research Council/FUGE [151918/S10]
  5. NARSAD distinguished investigator award
  6. Norwegian Research Council [181847/V50]
  7. American Women's Club of Oslo
  8. Medical Research Council [G9815508] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope Birth cohorts typically measure plasma folate in midgestation, but effects of folic acid supplementation are sometimes specific to the periconceptional period. The relationship between midgestation plasma folate and periconceptional supplementation is not known. We compared plasma folate at week 18 of gestation with self-report use of supplements comtaining folic acid from before pregnancy to week 17 of gestation. Methods and Results The sample comprised 2911 women from The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. For women reporting continuous supplementation from gestational week 4 to 17 (N = 238), median plasma folate was 15.72 at week 18 (in nmol/L). This was about threefold higher than the median plasma folate of 5.67 for women reporting no supplementation from week 4 to 17 (N = 844), but only slightly higher than the median plasma folate of 13.34 for all women reporting supplementation in weeks 1317 (N = 1158). Reported supplementation before week 8 was not associated with plasma folate at week 18, in an analysis that adjusted for continued supplementation after week 8. Conclusion Overall we found a strong and coherent relationship between self-reported folic acid use and plasma folate at week 18. We also found that plasma folate at week 18 did not reflect self-reported supplementation before week 8. For periconceptional supplementation per se, self-report data may offer a better measure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据