4.6 Review

Prostaglandin E2 EP1 Receptor Antagonist Improves Motor Deficits and Rescues Memory Decline in R6/1 Mouse Model of Huntington's Disease

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 784-795

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-013-8556-x

关键词

Long-term potentiation; Hippocampus; Striatum; Huntingtin; PSD-95; GluA1

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2011-29507, BFU2011-26339]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI10/01072]
  3. RETICS (CIBERNED) [R006/0010/0006]
  4. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha
  5. JCCM [PEII10-0095-8727]
  6. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR-00326]
  7. INCRECyT project from European Social Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we evaluated the potential beneficial effects of antagonizing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) EP1 receptor on motor and memory deficits in Huntington's disease (HD). To this aim, we implanted an osmotic mini-pump system to chronically administrate an EP1 receptor antagonist (SC-51089) in the R6/1 mouse model of HD, from 13 to 18 weeks of age, and used different paradigms to assess motor and memory function. SC-51089 administration ameliorated motor coordination and balance dysfunction in R6/1 mice as analyzed by rotarod, balance beam, and vertical pole tasks. Long-term memory deficit was also rescued after EP1 receptor antagonism as assessed by the T-maze spontaneous alternation and the novel object recognition tests. Additionally, treatment with SC-51089 improved the expression of specific synaptic markers and reduced the number of huntingtin nuclear inclusions in the striatum and hippocampus of 18-week-old R6/1 mice. Moreover, electrophysiological studies showed that hippocampal long-term potentiation was significantly recovered in R6/1 mice after EP1 receptor antagonism. Altogether, these results show that the antagonism of PGE2 EP1 receptor has a strong therapeutic effect on R6/1 mice and point out a new therapeutic candidate to treat motor and memory deficits in HD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据