4.5 Article

Axl Phosphorylates Elmo Scaffold Proteins To Promote Rac Activation and Cell Invasion

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 76-87

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00764-14

关键词

-

资金

  1. Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation
  2. Programmes de Biologie Moleculaire funds from the Universite de Montreal
  3. Ph.D. studentship from Emmanuel-Triassi-IRCM
  4. M.Sc. studentship from Wisent-IRCM
  5. Senior Investigator Award from the FRQ-S
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24111001] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The receptor tyrosine kinase Axl contributes to cell migration and invasion. Expression of Axl correlates with metastatic progression in cancer patients, yet the specific signaling events promoting invasion downstream of Axl are poorly defined. Herein, we report Elmo scaffolds to be direct substrates and binding partners of Axl. Elmo proteins are established to interact with Dock family guanine nucleotide exchange factors to control Rac-mediated cytoskeletal dynamics. Proteomics and mutagenesis studies reveal that Axl phosphorylates Elmo1/2 on a conserved carboxyl-terminal tyrosine residue. Upon Gas6-dependent activation of Axl, endogenous Elmo2 becomes phosphorylated on Tyr-713 and enters into a physical complex with Axl in breast cancer cells. Interfering with Elmo2 expression prevented Gas6-induced Rac1 activation in breast cancer cells. Similarly to blocking of Axl, Elmo2 knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of Dock1 abolishes breast cancer cell invasion. Interestingly, Axl or Elmo2 knockdown diminishes breast cancer cell proliferation. Rescue of Elmo2 knockdown cells with the wild-type protein but not with Elmo2 harboring Tyr-713-Phe mutations restores cell invasion and cell proliferation. These results define a new mechanism by which Axl promotes cell proliferation and invasion and identifies inhibition of the Elmo-Dock pathway as a potential therapeutic target to stop Axl-induced metastases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据