Response to Comment on "Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree"

ASTRAL-II: coalescent-based species tree estimation with many hundreds of taxa and thousands of genes

(2015) Siavash Mirarab et al.   BIOINFORMATICS

Coalescence vs. concatenation: Sophisticated analyses vs. first principles applied to rooting the angiosperms

(2015) Mark P. Simmons et al.   MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION

Comment on "Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree"

(2015) L. Liu et al.   SCIENCE

On the Robustness to Gene Tree Estimation Error (or lack thereof) of Coalescent-Based Species Tree Methods

(2015) Sebastien Roch et al.   SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY

Likelihood-based tree reconstruction on a concatenation of aligned sequence data sets can be statistically inconsistent

(2015) Sebastien Roch et al.   THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY

Weighted Statistical Binning: Enabling Statistically Consistent Genome-Scale Phylogenetic Analyses

(2015) Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid et al.   PLoS One

Phylogenetic analysis at deep timescales: Unreliable gene trees, bypassed hidden support, and the coalescence/concatalescence conundrum

(2014) John Gatesy et al.   MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION

Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree

(2014) S. Mirarab et al.   SCIENCE

Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds

(2014) E. D. Jarvis et al.   SCIENCE

Evaluating Summary Methods for Multilocus Species Tree Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Lineage Sorting

(2014) Siavash Mirarab et al.   SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY

A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model

(2010) Liang Liu et al.   BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY