4.5 Article

Exploring clinical reasoning in novices: a self-regulated learning microanalytic assessment approach

期刊

MEDICAL EDUCATION
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 280-291

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12303

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Air Force's Clinical Investigations Program, Office of the Air Force Surgeon General, Washington, DC, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThe primary objectives of this study were to examine the regulatory processes of medical students as they completed a diagnostic reasoning task and to examine whether the strategic quality of these regulatory processes were related to short-term and longer-term medical education outcomes. MethodsA self-regulated learning (SRL) microanalytic assessment was administered to 71second-year medical students while they read a clinical case and worked to formulate the most probable diagnosis. Verbal responses to open-ended questions targeting forethought and performance phase processes of a cyclical model of SRL were recorded verbatim and subsequently coded using a framework from prior research. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine the relationships between the SRL processes and several outcomes. ResultsMost participants (90%) reported focusing on specific diagnostic reasoning strategies during the task (metacognitive monitoring), but only about one-third of students referenced these strategies (e.g. identifying symptoms, integration) in relation to their task goals and plans for completing the task. After accounting for prior undergraduate achievement and verbal reasoning ability, strategic planning explained significant additional variance in course grade (R-2=0.15, p<0.01), second-year grade point average (R-2=0.14, p<0.01), United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score (R-2=0.08, p<0.05) and National Board of Medical Examiner subject examination score in internal medicine (R-2=0.10, p<0.05). ConclusionsThese findings suggest that most students in the formative stages of learning diagnostic reasoning skills are aware of and think about at least one key diagnostic reasoning process or strategy while solving a clinical case, but a substantially smaller percentage set goals or develop plans that incorporate such strategies. Given that students who developed more strategic plans achieved better outcomes, the potential importance of forethought regulatory processes is underscored. Discuss ideas arising from the article at '

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据