4.6 Article

Direct foamed and nano-catalyst impregnated solid-oxide fuel cell (SOFC) cathodes

期刊

MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 131-134

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.12.099

关键词

SOFC; Cathode; Direct foam; Impregnation; Nanomaterial

资金

  1. RES [DE-FE0004000]
  2. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, an agency of the United States Government
  3. URS Energy & Construction, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A binder system containing polyurethane precursors was used to in situ foam (direct foam) a (La0.6Sr0.4)(0.98) (Co-0.2 Fe-0.8)O3-delta (LSCF) cathode composition upon a yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) electrolyte coated with a porous similar to 10 mu m thick cathode active layer. The YSZ electrolyte was similar to 110 mu m in thickness, and a full cell was created by application of a Ni/(Ce0.9Gd0.1)O(2)cermetas the baseline anode. Cells possessing the foamed LSCF cathode were compared to cells constructed via standard methods in terms of resultant microstructure, electrochemical performance, and introceptive character. The foamed cathode tended to possess a high level of tortuous porosity which was ellipsoidal and interconnected in character. Both the standard and foamed cathode structures were subjected to an infiltration process, and the resultant microstructure was examined. The impregnation efficiency of the foamed cathode was at least similar to 10% greater per deposition than that of an unfoamed porous LSCF cathode. The SOFC with the Pt nano-catalyst impregnated foamed cathode demonstrated a maximum power density of 593 mW/cm(2) utilizing wet H-2 fuel, which is 52% higher than a SOFC with the baseline Pt-impregnated LSCF cathode (similar to 390 mW/cm(2)) at 800 degrees C. The cathode compositional and microstructural alterations obtainable by foaming led to the elevated power performance, which was shown to be quite high relative to standard SOFCs with a thick YSZ electrolyte. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据