4.4 Article

Chemical-looping combustion of syngas by means of spray-dried NiO oxygen carrier

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 2211-2217

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-011-0079-4

关键词

Oxygen Carrier; Chemical Looping Combustion; Nickel Oxide; Syngas; Carbon Dioxide

资金

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea [2009101010004C]
  2. KEPCO
  3. Korea South-East Power Company Ltd
  4. Western Power Company Ltd
  5. Midland Power Company Ltd
  6. Southern Power Company Ltd
  7. Fast-West Power Company, Ltd
  8. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE), Republic of Korea [2009101010004C] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) of syngas has a potential to generate power economically with achieving the inherent carbon dioxide capture. An oxygen carrier with high reactivity and excellent physical properties would make CLC technology more competitive. In this work, oxygen carrier with 70 wt% NiO was prepared by spray drying technique. The prepared oxygen carrier had excellent physical properties for fluidized-bed application of CLC process. The reactivity of the oxygen carrier in repeated reduction-oxidation was measured by thermogravimetric analyzer with simulated syngas. Oxygen carrier calcined at 1,100 degrees C showed high oxygen transfer capacity of 14.7 wt%, utilizing 98% of the transferable oxygen. Oxygen transfer capacity and oxygen transfer rate was increased with the increase of reaction temperature, and the highest oxygen transfer rate was observed when about half of the transferable oxygen reacted with syngas. The reduction rate of the syngas (mixture of H(2) and CO) appeared to be approximately the sum of the reaction rate of each fuel gas. The experimental results indicated that the spray-dried NiO oxygen carrier prepared in this work could be a good quality oxygen carrier for the CLC of syngas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据