4.8 Article

Cross-talk and regulatory interactions between the essential response regulator RpaB and cyanobacterial circadian clock output

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1424632112

关键词

signaling network; transcription regulation; chronobiology

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [BFU2012-33364]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana Grant [ACOMP/2014/144, GV/2014/073]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01GM062419]
  4. European Molecular Biology Organization postdoctoral Fellowship [ASTF 74-2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The response regulator RpaB (regulator of phycobilisome associated B), part of an essential two-component system conserved in cyanobacteria that responds to multiple environmental signals, has recently been implicated in the control of cell dimensions and of circadian rhythms of gene expression in the model cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. However, little is known of the molecular mechanisms that underlie RpaB functions. In this study we show that the regulation of phenotypes by RpaB is intimately connected with the activity of RpaA (regulator of phycobilisome associated A), the master regulator of circadian transcription patterns. RpaB affects RpaA activity both through control of gene expression, a function requiring an intact effector domain, and via altering RpaA phosphorylation, a function mediated through the N-terminal receiver domain of RpaB. Thus, both phosphorylation cross-talk and coregulation of target genes play a role in the genetic interactions between the RpaA and RpaB pathways. In addition, RpaB similar to P levels appear critical for survival under light: dark cycles, conditions in which RpaB phosphorylation is environmentally driven independent of the circadian clock. We propose that the complex regulatory interactions between the essential and environmentally sensitive NblS-RpaB system and the SasA-RpaA clock output system integrate relevant extra- and intracellular signals to the circadian clock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据