4.6 Review

Novel biological strategies for treatment of wear particle-induced periprosthetic osteolysis of orthopaedic implants for joint replacement

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0962

关键词

wear particles; orthopaedic implants; inflammation; cell trafficking; macrophage polarization; NF-kappa B

资金

  1. NIH [2R01AR055650-05, 1R01AR063717]
  2. Ellenburg Chair in Surgery at Stanford University
  3. Stanford Medical Scholars Program
  4. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  5. HUS evo grant
  6. Orthopaedic Hospital of the Invalid Foundation
  7. Finska Lakaresallskapet, Academy of Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wear particles and by-products from joint replacements and other orthopaedic implants may result in a local chronic inflammatory and foreign body reaction. This may lead to persistent synovitis resulting in joint pain and swelling, peri-prosthetic osteolysis, implant loosening and pathologic fracture. Strategies to modulate the adverse effects of wear debris may improve the function and longevity of joint replacements and other orthopaedic implants, potentially delaying or avoiding complex revision surgical procedures. Three novel biological strategies to mitigate the chronic inflammatory reaction to orthopaedic wear particles are reported. These include (i) interference with systemic macrophage trafficking to the local implant site, (ii) modulation of macrophages from an M1 (pro-inflammatory) to an M2 (anti-inflammatory, pro-tissue healing) phenotype in the periprosthetic tissues, and (iii) local inhibition of the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) by delivery of an NF-kappa B decoy oligodeoxynucleotide, thereby interfering with the production of pro-inflammatory mediators. These three approaches have been shown to be viable strategies for mitigating the undesirable effects of wear particles in preclinical studies. Targeted local delivery of specific biologics may potentially extend the lifetime of orthopaedic implants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据