4.6 Article

Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Significant efforts are underway within the biomedical research community to encourage sharing and reuse of research data in order to enhance research reproducibility and enable scientific discovery. While some technological challenges do exist, many of the barriers to sharing and reuse are social in nature, arising from researchers' concerns about and attitudes toward sharing their data. In addition, clinical and basic science researchers face their own unique sets of challenges to sharing data within their communities. This study investigates these differences in experiences with and perceptions about sharing data, as well as barriers to sharing among clinical and basic science researchers. Methods Clinical and basic science researchers in the Intramural Research Program at the National Institutes of Health were surveyed about their attitudes toward and experiences with sharing and reusing research data. Of 190 respondents to the survey, the 135 respondents who identified themselves as clinical or basic science researchers were included in this analysis. Odds ratio and Fisher's exact tests were the primary methods to examine potential relationships between variables. Worst-case scenario sensitivity tests were conducted when necessary. Results and Discussion While most respondents considered data sharing and reuse important to their work, they generally rated their expertise as low. Sharing data directly with other researchers was common, but most respondents did not have experience with uploading data to a repository. A number of significant differences exist between the attitudes and practices of clinical and basic science researchers, including their motivations for sharing, their reasons for not sharing, and the amount of work required to prepare their data. Conclusions Even within the scope of biomedical research, addressing the unique concerns of diverse research communities is important to encouraging researchers to share and reuse data. Efforts at promoting data sharing and reuse should be aimed at solving not only technological problems, but also addressing researchers' concerns about sharing their data. Given the varied practices of individual researchers and research communities, standardizing data practices like data citation and repository upload could make sharing and reuse easier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: A systematic review

Erica G. Bromley, Folasade P. May, Lisa Federer, Brennan M. R. Spiegel, Martijn G. H. van Oijen

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2015)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Data sharing in PLOS ONE: An analysis of Data Availability Statements

Lisa M. Federer, Christopher W. Belter, Douglas J. Joubert, Alicia Livinski, Ya-Ling Lu, Lissa N. Snyders, Holly Thompson

PLOS ONE (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Long-term availability of data associated with articles in PLOS ONE

Lisa M. Federer

Summary: The adoption of journal policies requiring authors to include a Data Availability Statement has increased the availability of research data. This study extracted URLs and DOIs from Data Availability Statements in PLOS ONE papers and found that 80% of the resources could be retrieved automatically. Manual testing of a subset of URLs and DOIs showed retrieval rates of 78% and 98% respectively. Having a DOI and being shared in a repository were positively associated with availability. These findings highlight the importance of including URLs and DOIs in Data Availability Statements.

PLOS ONE (2022)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Building visualization skills through investigating the Journal of the Medical Library Association coauthorship network from 2006-2017

Rebecca Reznik-Zellen, Alexander J. Carroll, Eileen G. Harrington, Douglas James Joubert, Tyler Nix, Kristine M. Alpi

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2020)

Editorial Material Information Science & Library Science

Announcing the Journal of the Medical Library Association's data sharing policy

Katherine G. Akers, Kevin B. Read, Liz Amos, Lisa M. Federer, Ayaba Logan, T. Scott Plutchak

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2019)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Defining data librarianship: a survey of competencies, skills, and training

Lisa Federer

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2018)

Review Rheumatology

Esophageal surgeries in systemic sclerosis (SSc) - a systematic review of the literature

Yossra Suliman, Sachin Srinivasan, Mary S. Maish, Lisa M. Federer, Daniel E. Furst

JOURNAL OF SCLERODERMA AND RELATED DISORDERS (2016)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Data literacy training needs of biomedical researchers

Lisa M. Federer, Ya-Ling Lu, Douglas J. Joubert

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2016)

Article Information Science & Library Science

The librarian as research informationist: a case study

Lisa Federer

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2013)

Meeting Abstract Gastroenterology & Hepatology

A Systematic Review of Patient, Provider, and System Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening With Colonoscopy in African-Americans

Erica G. Bromley, Folasade P. May, Lisa Federer, Brennan M. Spiegel, Martijn G. van Oijen

GASTROENTEROLOGY (2013)

Meeting Abstract Clinical Neurology

Determinants Of Benefit From Endovascular Recanalization In Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Anil V. Yallapragada, Amrit S. Ahluwalia, Lisa Federer, Jeffrey L. Saver

STROKE (2013)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Empowering your institution through assessment

Douglas J. Joubert, Tamera P. Lee

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2007)

暂无数据