4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Beyond the threshold: an etiological bridge between hypoxia and immunity in preeclampsia

期刊

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 112-116

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2010.01.002

关键词

Preeclampsia; Hypoxia; IL-10 deficiency; Angiogenesis; Apoptosis

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR018728] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P42 ES013660] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Taking a cue from the recent workshop 'Preeclampsia-A Pressing Problem' sponsored by the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, this review article takes a fresh look at hypoxia and a dysfunctional immune system as the key contributors to the etiology of preeclampsia and the mechanisms involved therein. In the context of epidemiological research on the intricate and multifactorial nature of preeclampsia, we focus on hypoxia as an upstream regulator of preeclampsia and its consequences in a model compromised by a deficiency in key pregnancy compatible immune modulators. It has been proposed that placental hypoxia releases cytotoxic factors produced at the maternal-fetal interface into the circulation to manifest the maternal symptoms associated with preeclampsia. However, it is not clear how this mechanism is empowered in pregnant women. Does systemic hypoxia exert preeclampsia-like effects on pregnancy? Are these effects further manifested by intrinsic inflammation in the absence of key immune modulators such as IL-10? Thus, it is of paramount importance that in vivo models be developed wherein the role of systemic hypoxia can be evaluated for preeclampsia-causing events. We present a discussion on whether prolonged exposure to hypoxia can lead to a perpetual cycle of compartmentalized uteroplacental tissue damage, release of anti-angiogenic and vasoconstrictive factors that impair trophoblast invasion and promote systemic vascular resistance resulting in the maternal syndrome. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据