4.6 Article

Geometric and Electronic Structure of the Aqueous Al(H2O)63+ Complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 112, 期 42, 页码 10595-10603

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp802675v

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF (Chemical Sciences-EMSI program)
  2. BES DOE (Geosciences)
  3. EPA STAR
  4. NSF graduate research fellowships
  5. Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bonding environment of the aqueous Al(H2O)(6)(3+) complex was Studied using X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy at the Al K-edge, with spectral interpretations based on density functional theory (DFT). Calculations for a highly symmetric complex (T-h symmetry) indicate electron transitions into Al 3p-O 2s and Al 3 p-O 2p antibonding orbitals, with a split O 2p contribution that appears to be due to a weak pi-interaction of the Al 3p orbitals with water ligands off-axis (equatorial) with respect to the At 3p axis. Calculations were performed with several hypothetical structures to assess the effects of Al-O bond length, orientation of water ligands in the first coordination shell, and the presence of a second solvation shell on the XANES spectrum. Similar transitions were observed in all of these cases, but with further splitting on addition of 12 solvation waters, inward tilting and random twisting of the water ligands, and nonuniform Al-O bond lengths. Although it was previously hypothesized that the broadness of the XANES spectrum for this complex is due to an asymmetric geometry, these results illustrate how an Al(H2O)(6)(3+) geometry that is octahedral (O-h) with respect to the Al-O-6 core could produce the broad spectrum observed. Because geometric distortions would affect relative Al-O bond strengths, an understanding of the equilibrium Al(H2O)(6)(3+) geometry is prerequisite to a quantitative description of reaction chemistry, including acidity and ligand exchange.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据