4.6 Article

Current In Vitro Testing of Bioactive Peptides Is Not Valuable

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 140, 期 1, 页码 117-118

出版社

AMER SOC NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.116228

关键词

-

资金

  1. Unilever, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dietary peptides have been suggested to possess biological activity in vivo and could affect cardiovascular disease parameters, based on data derived from in vitro experiments. Isolated peptides are often tested in in vitro cellular assays or on heterologously expressed molecular target proteins. The stimulatory or inhibitory effect on target proteins in vitro has often been used as the justification to test these compounds directly in vivo. Unfortunately, this research approach has an inherent flaw. It neglects the poor absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties of peptides resulting in low peptide bioavailability. Because peptides are prone to extensive hydrolysis in the gastrointestinal tract by stomach, small intestinal, and brush border peptidases, most of them do not reach the absorption stage in the duodenum and jejunum. Therefore, a valid research approach should include the demonstration of stability of the peptide toward luminal and brush border peptidases and evaluate its ADME properties. Surprisingly, only very few animal and human studies determined absolute concentrations and kinetics of bioactive peptides. These studies have shown the presence of selected peptides in plasma samples at pico- and nanomolar concentrations with fast elimination kinetics in the minute range. For the correct interpretation of results, it is advised that researchers refer to the data currently available concerning bioavailability and ADME properties in humans, Two mandatory criteria for future in vitro studies investigating potential biological activities of peptides should be using physiologically relevant concentrations and times. J. Nutr. 140: 117-118, 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据