4.5 Article

Post-Injury Administration of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore Inhibitor, NIM811, Is Neuroprotective and Improves Cognition after Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 1845-1853

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2011.1755

关键词

cognitive function; mitochondria; neurodegeneration; neuroprotection; TBI

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service [R01 NS48191, R01 NS062993, P30 NS051220, T32 DA022738]
  2. Kentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Research Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial dysfunction is known to play a pivotal role in cell death mechanisms following traumatic brain injury (TBI). N-methyl-4-isoleucine-cyclosporin (NIM811), a non-immunosuppressive cyclosporin A (CsA) analog, inhibits the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) and has been shown to be neuroprotective following TBI in mice. However, the translation of the neuroprotective effects of mPTP inhibitors, including CsA and NIM811, into improved cognitive end points has yet to be fully investigated. Therefore, to build upon these results, a severe unilateral controlled cortical impact model of TBI was used in the present study to establish a dose-response curve for NIM811 in rats. The findings demonstrate that the neuroprotection afforded by NIM811 is dose dependent, with the 10 mg/kg dose being the most effective dose. Once the dose response was established, we evaluated the effect of the optimal dose of NIM811 on behavior, mitochondrial bioenergetics, and mitochondrial oxidative damage following TBI. For behavioral studies, rats were administered NIM811 at 15 min and 24 h post-injury, with cognitive testing beginning 10 days post-injury. Mitochondrial studies involved a single injection of NIM811 at 15 min post-injury followed by mitochondrial isolation at 6 h post-injury. The results revealed that the optimal dose of NIM811 improves cognition, improves mitochondrial functioning, and reduces oxidative damage following TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据