4.2 Article

Angiogenic biomarkers for prediction of early preeclampsia onset in high-risk women

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 1038-1048

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.847415

关键词

Angiogenic factors; placenta growth factor (PlGF); preeclampsia; soluble endoglin (sEng); soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1)

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1RR031982, UL1TR000161]
  2. Wilson Genetics Endowment of the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes mellitus, history of prior preeclampsia and obese nulliparity are maternal conditions associated with increased preeclampsia risk. Whether altered maternal angiogenic factor levels allow for prediction of pending disease is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate angiogenic factors for early preeclampsia prediction in high-risk women. Methods: Serial serum specimens were collected from 157 women at high preeclampsia risk and 50 low-risk controls between 23 and 36 weeks gestation in 3 windows (23-27.6, 28-31.6, and 32-35.6 weeks) in a two-center observational cohort. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1), placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble endoglin (sEng) were measured by ELISA. Results: Multivariate parsimonious logistic regression analyses using backward elimination for prediction of early-preeclampsia (diagnosed < 34 weeks) found the best-fitting model included the predictors (1) sFlt1 measured in the second window (28-31.6 weeks) with AUC 0.85, sensitivity 67% and specificity 96% and (2) sFlt1 measured in the first window (23-27.6 weeks) and sEng change between first and second window with AUC 0.91, sensitivity 86% and specificity 96%. Conclusions: Two-stage sampling screening protocol utilizing sFlt1 and sEng is promising for prediction of preeclampsia diagnosed before 34 weeks. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据