4.5 Review

Cellular stress response and innate immune signaling: integrating pathways in host defense and inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 6, 页码 1167-1184

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0313153

关键词

PRR signaling; innate immune response; oxidative stress; heat shock; ER stress; DNA damage

资金

  1. Public Health Service from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [AA017986]
  2. U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
  3. Defense grant [W81XWH-11-1- 0420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Review on the role of cellular stress proteins in innate immune signaling responses during infection and inflammation. Extensive research in the past decade has identified innate immune recognition receptors and intracellular signaling pathways that culminate in inflammatory responses. Besides its role in cytoprotection, the importance of cell stress in inflammation and host defense against pathogens is emerging. Recent studies have shown that proteins in cellular stress responses, including the heat shock response, ER stress response, and DNA damage response, interact with and regulate signaling intermediates involved in the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. The effect of such regulation by cell stress proteins may dictate the inflammatory profile of the immune response during infection and disease. In this review, we describe the regulation of innate immune cell activation by cell stress pathways, present detailed descriptions of the types of stress response proteins and their crosstalk with immune signaling intermediates that are essential in host defense, and illustrate the relevance of these interactions in diseases characteristic of aberrant immune responses, such as chronic inflammatory diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cancer. Understanding the crosstalk between cellular stress proteins and immune signaling may have translational implications for designing more effective regimens to treat immune disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据